Oscar season is in full swing, and 2014 has come to its
close. In many ways, it’s both a blessing and a curse. The end of the year
towards the first half of January finally gives us a chance to witness many of
the year’s best and most anticipated films, usually the raved Oscar
heavyweights. However, it also usually yields some truly horrendous new
releases as well. But January isn’t the only month we get some truly awful
films. For every Birdman, there will also be a Left Behind. For every How to
Train Your Dragon 2, there’s a Planes: Fire and Rescue. So, like I did, last
year, I’m counting down the worst 2014 films I saw, but rather than five, I’m
increasing this year’s slate to ten to unleash some bottled up negativity on
these awful movies.
I saw a total of about 74 films this year, and while I don’t consider 2014 to be a bad year for movies, compared to last year’s slate of releases, it had by far less variety,
overloaded by sequels and the like (even those that I liked), so much so that a movie where Seth Rogen shoves a tracer up his butt is now part of American history. In spite of
what wholly original films I saw, it also yielded just as many that were vile
and insulting. Keep in mind that I haven’t seen some reportedly horrible titles
like Left Behind, Sex Tape, God’s Not Dead, The Legend of Hercules, Quija, Grace of Monaco, or Exodus: Gods and Kings
(Because I’d prefer to see something I might actually enjoy), so this is limited
exclusively to my worst experiences.
Not quite making it on this list is The Expendables 3, a
mildly fun movie that unfortunately lacks any of the same spark and witty
chemistry that made the first two films enjoyable. Also just missing out is the
Michael Bay-produced Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a generally inoffensive and
harmless movie, but is too overly rushed and underdeveloped to recommend. This is Where I Leave You had a charming and A-Game cast all across the board, but saddled them with thoroughly mediocre characterizations and dialogue, as well as a wildly undisciplined tone. The
Amazing Spiderman 2 suffered from an overload of subplots and characters,
highlighting obvious interference from Sony, and saved only by the chemistry of
its two leads. Meanwhile, Grumpy Cat’s Worst Christmas Ever may not have gotten
a theatrical release, but is such a bizarre and nonsensical movie that, oddly
enough, I think you should check out to believe.
As for the real top ten, I’ve not had the “honor” of
reviewing most of them, so this list will also act as a review page for them.
With that said, let’s begin.
Number 10
Godzilla
Dir. Gareth Edwards
I’m sorry, but by every non-superficial standpoint, this
movie is horrible. I never got why so many people gravitated towards it. It
wants to emulate classic Steven Spielberg creature features, but whereas those
movies had interesting characters and great showcases for the creatures, this
movie has neither of those.
Anytime we actually get to see the monsters, it’s almost
always from a secondhand perspective, and rather than let the movie linger on
any of these potentially awesome sequences, it instead prefers to cut straight
to the aftermath, or back to the human characters. How is this ANY fun?!
Be that as it may, I’d be willing to forgive this vice if
the human characters were engaging at all… But they’re not! Tell me something.
Aside from their jobs and how they look, name me *one* thing about them
personality-wise. I’ll give you a hint: It can’t be done. These humans are all
one note, hollow, cardboard stereotypes with absolutely no identity, and making
matters worse is that the supporting players are not only glorified cameos, but
the film focuses on the LEAST. INTERESTING. HUMAN. In the movie! Aaron
Taylor-Johnson gives the single worst performance of 2014, obviously bored and
possessing the emotional range of Darth Vader. It’s not that I don’t want to
care for the humans, but that the film just won’t LET me.
I hate this movie. I despise it with every bone in my body,
but the only reason it’s not higher up is because of the technicians who make
it look and sound much better than it deserves. The fact that I found nine
other movies I hate more is deeply unsettling.
** / *****
Number 9
The Nut Job
The Nut Job
No, I didn’t see Planes: Fire and Rescue, but I did see this
movie. An uninspired call back to the Looney Tunes style of heist humor, while this
movie at least has the saving grace of the ever charismatic and witty Will
Arnett, it’s one of the most clichéd and unentertaining movies I saw all year.
The film is just plain boring, its humor rarely ever striking a chord, and
relying on frequent nut puns that quickly become obnoxious (such as the lost city of Nutlantis. Get it? GET IT?!). These characters
could have been funny, but are all plain and beyond flat, with much of their
material aimed at the lowest common denominator. I don’t even know what else to
say. It’s a complete bore, but if there’s one positive thing I can say about it,
it’s this. At least it’s not the worst movie Brendan Fraser’s ever been in.
*1/2 / *****
Number 8
The Raid 2
Dir. Gareth Evans
I hate these movies. I really do. When the first Raid film
was released two years ago, I found myself in the minority opinion of finding
it incoherent, repetitive, and mind-numbing. This sequel is pretty much all of
those things, but takes itself more seriously this time (and is FIFTY minutes
longer). While I won’t deny that the photography is nice, and the choreography
is pretty fun (when we can actually *see it*), it quickly becomes dull and predictable
the longer we have to endure it. The filmmakers don't seem to realize that these moves, cool as they may be, quickly lose their novelty after seeing the same trick performed 5 million times. It eventually feels like watching someone else
play a video game, its story a muddled mess, and its gratuitous violence
becoming increasingly mean-spirited. I’m not one to squirm so easily over bloody
violence, but even this movie was testing my tolerance for it. These movies
seem to mistake shameless gratuity for social relevance, when in actuality it
couldn’t be farther from it. It’s making absolutely no point with any of its
brutality, instead feeling like blatant pandering to those craving blood. It's too ridiculous to take seriously, yet too grim to have any fun with. If
you liked the first, you’ll probably enjoy this sequel, but if you didn’t,
stay away. Stay far away!
*1/2 / *****
Number 7
Blended
Dir. Frank Coraci
It may not be Adam Sandler at his most desperate, but it’s
one of the worst examples of using a script as an excuse to take a glorified
vacation. Blended reeks of promotional ad imagery from beginning to end,
feeling less like a movie for its own sake, and more an excuse for Sandler and
his friends to meet up and have fun with the beautiful scenery and activities
(a common trait in his films now). However, even without that in mind, this
movie would still be awful. The jokes in this film are almost always terrible
either to how ill-conceived they are, or how mean-spirited they come across, especially
when directed at Sandler’s character’s eldest daughter. It’s actually fitting that
the movie has one admittedly clever gag that is then milked a second time. And
yet, it’s still not the worst Adam Sandler movie on this list…
*1/2 / *****
Number 6
Transformers: Age of Extinction
Dir. Michael Bay
That’s right! I hate this movie more than ever. I initially
backed off on it, saying it wasn’t quite as bad as Revenge of the Fallen… but
the more I thought about it, the more that I realized it was. It’s just about
the most cynical, most insulting film in this series.
I won’t act like Bay isn’t a talented director, as he’s made
some movies I actually liked, but it sees all of his usual stylistics turned up
to an obnoxious 12. Sunset imagery, male-teenager pandering, gratuitous
explosions and shots of American flags, the ever so annoying humor, and this
film takes itself more seriously than before. On top of having some of the
worst performances of the year (including Lost’s Titus Welliver in a turn that
should have him blacklisted), it is infuriatingly long and padded. This movie
is loaded with filler, badly in need of an hour of trimming, and full of
ridiculous subplots. Even the visuals and sound effects, typically a saving grace for these films, are nowhere near as seamless or creative as they once were. Sure, it may be awesome to have Peter Cullen and Frank Welker acting off of each other as hero and villain once again, but that's a cheap payoff for enduring endless padding.
Most of all, I hate everything this movie represents. The
film tries to lampshade its complete rehash and lack of creativity with lines
like “It’s nothing but crap sequels and remakes nowadays.” Michael Bay doesn’t
get to make this joke after making a career out of this crap!!! I’m ashamed to
have paid money to see this, and the fact that THIS was the first film to have
a 100 million dollar opening weekend this year (not 22 Jump Street, not How to
Train Your Dragon 2, or literally a dozen superior films released that summer)
is a discouraging sign. Nobody deserves money for not even trying to make a movie good (Michael Bay openly admitted that though it would suck, people will still see it!), and while I don't want to call audiences stupid, I am calling us overly content to eat up the same thing over and over again, having absolutely no variety and insulting the intelligence of its audience. Audiences deserve much better than this assault-on-the-senses filth gives us, and with Michael Bay finally stepping down from directing
this series, hopefully Ehren Kruger will follow suit so the fifth film can
FINALLY restore some actual focus to these films.
*1/2 / *****
Number 5
Men, Women & Children
Dir. Jason Reitman
What’s sad is that Adam Sandler actually gives the best
performance in this ensemble piece. He’s the only one who even seems to be
trying, as the rest of the film eventually succumbs to superficiality and
boredom.
Jason Reitman is a talented director, but everything
charming about his prior films has been completely stripped out, with his
abrasive analysis of the widespread impact of social media quickly turning into
a cheap gimmick. The film has no consistent pace to it, and the performances,
oddly enough, feel too subdued. I like a little subtlety, but eventually it
just becomes one note, especially when they deliver such stupid dialogue so
sincerely. How Emma Thompson (narrating the film) says all of the things she
does without the slightest bit of irony or sarcasm is beyond me.
The most standout performance (for all of the wrong reasons)
is Jennifer Garner as a concerned mother with all the subtlety of SNL’s Church
Lady. The commentary Reitman wants to make regarding this character quickly
becomes heavy handed and all too predictable, especially in one scene that
leads into the attempted suicide of one character. This scene deserves a huge
middle finger in its direction, and you’ll likely want to shower and wash away
the griminess you feel after the film
has reached its conclusion.
* / *****
Number 4
Annie
Dir. Will Gluck
The film I enjoyed most this year for the wrong reasons,
Annie is a terribly misconceived idea the moment it begins. I’ve already made
it clear that I’m not a huge fan of the original musical, but even fans of it
will detest its treatment here. The acting all across the board is embarrassing
(especially from Jamie Foxx), the production values incredibly plain and cheap,
and the songs all processed and auto-tuned within an inch of their life
(complete with terrible lip-synching). That's all before we get down to its desperate attempt to lampshade its product placement, and glorifying cell phone companies invading the privacy of their customers (Because Annie is Jamie Foxx's "This"). However bad it may be though, it can
still be enjoyed for what a colossal train wreck it is, a series of ideas so
misguided that you wonder why anyone thought it would work. It certainly helps
that Cameron Diaz (perhaps by intention) gives a performance more over the top
than Jeremy Irons in Dungeons and Dragons, completely going bonkers in every
scene she’s in and having fun with it.
Is it a bad movie? Yes, but this movie was to me what Winter’s
Tale was to everyone else.
* / *****
Speaking of Winter’s Tale…
Number 3
Winter’s Tale
Dir. Akiva Goldsman
Courtesy of the dumping ground that is February, we have my
number three on our list. Work this math out for me if you will. Apparently an
angelic, flying horse is actually a dog…
Do you see how stupid this movie is just by what I’ve
described?! I’m convinced that Akiva Goldsman wanted to troll us with this
movie (Which would also explain Batman & Robin in the process), because the
fact that he was able to get such a great group of actors to not only play
these parts, but play them completely straight is baffling. How did any of them
say dialogue this ridiculous without snickering? The film just builds its
breathtaking stupidity to new heights, with bits like Will Smith as Lucifer
(wearing a Jimi Hendrix t-shirt), and the 90 year-old Eva Marie Saint as a 110
year old magazine editor.
NOTHING ABOUT THIS MOVIE MAKES ANY FREAKING SENSE!
NOTHING ABOUT THIS MOVIE MAKES ANY FREAKING SENSE!
And honestly, that’s the movie’s charm. I absolutely
understand why people would love this movie in a so bad, it’s fun kind of way.
It’s a film perfect for riffing and drinking games, and is truly a movie that
should be seen to be believed.
* / *****
Number 2
Non-Stop
Dir. Jaume Collet-Serra
Once again, you’ve got February to thank for this.
Liam Neeson has quickly become the go-to guy for action
thrillers in need of an older, more grisly action type, but as time has
progressed, the novelty of the first Taken film has quickly worn thin. While
films like The Grey have been notable exceptions for him, Non-Stop is by far
the worst one he’s been in to date. Truth be told, he isn’t bad in the film.
For the first hour and twenty minutes, he’s actually the only thing that
manages to carry it, albeit with subpar results. The movie, for the most part,
is just dull and unmemorable. Just about everything in this movie is empty and surface value, with one note characters that border on parody, and suspense sequences that teeter into pure silliness. By all accounts, it’s nothing special.
But once the final act finally gets under way, that’s when
the film stops being dull, and becomes straight up insulting. Do not
underestimate me when I say no movie made me feel more heated and furious than
the third act of Non-Stop, where the motivations for the movie’s overall
premise taking place become laughably stupid, and that’s before they work in
the single most shameless exploitation of 9/11 I’ve ever seen in a film, and
this is coming from someone who actually defended Extremely Loud and Incredibly
Close. If this abomination of a climax didn’t exist, I severely doubt that
anyone would even remember this movie.
But it does, so we did. This movie should have went straight to cable to the one channel where it's stupidity would have felt right at home... The Syfy channel.
And the sad thing is there’s still one movie worse than this…
And the sad thing is there’s still one movie worse than this…
* / *****
Number 1
Vampire Academy
Dir. Mark Watters
And here we are, folks! It’s the granddaddy of them all.
Take a wild guess what month this film was released.
If your answer was anything but February, then you’re just
mocking me now. Really, February was the perfect place to dump this movie, but
what’s baffling is that this movie came out the SAME weekend as The Lego Movie.
How is it that one of the year’s best movies was released so early in the year,
yet Hollywood has no excuse for the rest of the films released this month for
being so terrible? I’ve seen quite a bit of bad movies this year, but Vampire
Academy towers over them all. This is not only the worst movie of 2014, it’s
one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It’s up there with Battlefield Earth
and Manos. It’s worse than The Room!
Vampire Academy seeks to mock the ongoing trend of young
adult novel adaptations, trying to poke fun at all of the stupid actions and superficiality done in
films such as Twilight, but eventually ends up becoming exactly one of those
movies. The film is an hour and forty minutes of exposition, cramming
information at every single turn to the point that characters can’t drift off
to sleep without delivering tidbits of back stories. It’s a film that never
allows its audience to take a breath and take in everything they’ve seen and
heard, ultimately in a race to cram in the next need-to-know subplot and
magical workings of this world. The actors have absolutely no chemistry with each other, the various romances are based on nothing but the characters being attracted solely because of physical looks, and when the villains are finally revealed, they're so incompetent and weak that you wonder why we're even supposed to consider them a threat.
Mark Watters fails miserably to recreate the same vibe that made his movie Mean Girls a success, with his brother, screenwriter Daniel Watters (the one hit wonder behind Heathers), establishing a series of weakly conceived jokes with abysmal execution. His effects are cheesy and unconvincing, and the moods of the Mean Girls humor with the Twilight-Esque action and romance clash harshly with each other, resulting in tonal whiplash. All of that is before it desperately tacks on a sequel baiting ending. However, with how poorly this film ultimately did with critics and audiences, we can at least be thankful that a sequel will never happen. The beast is slain!
Vampire Academy is not merely bad. It’s irredeemable. It’s a
hollow, empty shell of a film that would have felt dated in 2008 when Twilight
started gaining popularity, a career low for anyone and everyone involved with
it, and with these remaining words I have for it, I’m glad that I can finally
drive the last nail into this corpse of a movie’s coffin.
Goodbye and good riddance!
Zero stars! / *****
Well, that was therapeutic, and now that I’ve gotten all of
this bitter negativity out, I hope you’ll join me next week for my list of the
top ten best films of 2014. See you then…
No comments:
Post a Comment